By the end of this article, you’ll be able to answer the question, “Which is better, MKV or MP4?” Keep reading to understand the main differences, areas where each video format shines, and where they fall short. The format you choose depends on your preference and what works best in your situation. Most devices support MP4 without any problem because of its backward compatibility. However, compatible devices, or media players, are more limited for MKV compared to MP4. The newer of the two, MKV, offers better quality than its older counterpart. Each video format has pros and cons, so a deeper analysis is required to make an informed decision.īoth the MKV and MP4 video formats are used for streaming content. ![]() Unfortunately, there isn’t a clear-cut answer. Streamers often need help deciding which format works best with their brand. A hotly debated topic in the world of streaming is the choice between two video formats: MKV vs. Choosing the appropriate video streaming format is part of that learning curve. I'm trying to play on a bluray player and I'm pretty sure most dvd players don't support mkv.As a professional broadcaster or live streamer, you must understand the technology that makes or breaks your content. In that case I'll just take the slower option. Outside of the Apple bubble, MKV is widely supported by current hardware and software players. QuoteI may need to do more files as well, because it appears people like to use mkv despite it being not very compatible. If both file size and quality matter, use x264 and accept relatively slow encoding speed at good quality levels. possible read spead) don't matter, but the time matters and a hw accelerated encoder is available, yank the bitrate to 10000kbps (this might be even the default value) in the configuration of the "Nvidia H264" encoder to keep quality close to that of the source (you will always lose quality by re-encoding). If the video stream is HEVC, then apart from AV1 (which we support only for decoding at the moment), everything will inflate the file size unless you reduce resolution or accept a very big drop in quality. ![]() QuoteBecause I plan to remux 13 fullHD files which are ~200mb each. Maybe ~2x bitrate for the same visual quality compared to x264, but very content-dependent. I fear, I can't provide any solid estimates. QuoteAnd just how low compression are we talking? How might I enable this hardware accelerated encoder?ĭoes your laptop have a NVIDIA graphics card? If yes and the NVIDIA graphics driver is very recent, there should be a "Nvidia H264" encoder in the list of video encoders. If your laptop has a NVIDIA graphics card, you might try the NVIDIA H.264 hw accelerated encoder, which achieves only low compression but is blazingly fast. 1/4 of real time) is an excellent speed at the default quality level. Quote from: eumagga0x2a on January 12, 2020, 03:44:29 PMĢ hours for a fullHD video (approx. Also, I was not able to understand the solution because of my lack of knowledge in programming. ![]() Pretty sure it's because of the OPUS codec but is there anything I can do to change this? I saw a previous thread ( ) which had a solution in an older version but they had a PCM codec in their file. I'm trying to convert a mkv to mp4 losslessly so I can run the file on a bluray player, and so I want to remux to mp4, but saving as mp4 just brings up the error, "Unsupported - Only AAC, AC3, E-AC3, MP2, MP3 and Vorbis supported for audio". I'm running a nightly build, the latest as of now: 2.7.5 Hi, new to the forums and muxing, so apologies for being slowĮxtra data: 01 02 20 00 00 00 90 00 00 00
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |